The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in1999.
summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table describes the share of six kinds of members of poor families around Australia in 1999. Every single type of household is accumulated in all numbers of poor families, then the result is compared to all Australia households.
Overall, in 1999, the couple lovers were, seemingly, less poverty than the single person who rose a family. Comparatively, the gap between both was around 1% to 9.
The contrast between the elder couple and single old pupil was only small that was 1%. The two aged lovers settled in 4% and the independent person was 6%. The first big gap was had on the families with no babies, the gap set at 8%. Finally, the second high gap was 9% that was related to the married person who nurtured the childern and the single mother who bare the babies.
Above all, the highest number poverty household occurred on sole parents, the population was 933.000, and the lowest proportion was had on the older lovers which were populated with 48.000 numbers of groups.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 156, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...n 4% and the independent person was 6%. The first big gap was had on the families w...
^^^
Line 4, column 48, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll, the highest number poverty household occurred on sole parents, the population...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ulated with 48.000 numbers of groups.
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['finally', 'first', 'second', 'so', 'then']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.252525252525 0.268076937826 94% => OK
Verbs: 0.141414141414 0.116061578633 122% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0909090909091 0.0759168565197 120% => OK
Adverbs: 0.030303030303 0.0366838410393 83% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0 0.0131127313244 0% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.106060606061 0.155750635184 68% => OK
Participles: 0.0454545454545 0.0379272487307 120% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.4201973736 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0151515151515 0.0210936926555 72% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.151515151515 0.0948980150116 160% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0252525252525 0.00967000014798 261% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 991.0 1161.00487805 85% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.9 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.76162790698 5.90752243213 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73763899035 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.348837209302 0.337110787985 103% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.232558139535 0.247514529752 94% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.145348837209 0.171178102325 85% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0813953488372 0.112407865282 72% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4201973736 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593023255814 0.546246751206 109% => OK
Word variations: 53.2415651627 49.3433353143 108% => OK
How many sentences: 9.0 8.93414634146 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.1111111111 23.0094962315 83% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2419829555 42.9750493124 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.111111111 135.714022679 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 23.0094962315 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.555555555556 0.689975730869 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.48048780488 203% => OK
Readability: 42.3669250646 47.7609492067 89% => OK
Elegance: 2.35294117647 2.94281807926 80% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.456513509174 0.418131533498 109% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.17813990364 0.181151798455 98% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0937321248679 0.0850326197045 110% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.753358030696 0.706616315825 107% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.128974608201 0.157042692854 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.248785722829 0.228904883108 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0748721980304 0.108899403657 69% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.375532516825 0.367819155151 102% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.135557295294 0.0812612215331 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.3065293593 0.316326947829 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501599086448 0.0921553760075 54% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70731707317 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.14146341463 350% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.08536585366 49% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.16585365854 95% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 0.956097560976 418% => Less negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.02926829268 66% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 7.1512195122 126% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.