The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.
The table shows the rate of poverty in six types of family structure in Australia in 1999.
Overall, single-breadwinner families suffered from poverty more often than couples, and it can also be seen that family with children were more likely to be poor than those without. In terms of age distribution, the elderly was considerably less poor than other categories.
It is worth to take into consideration that families with single-mom or single-dad accounted for the most part in national poverty population, at 21%. This figure was slightly lower for single-no children family with the proportion of 19%. With regard to single-aged people, there was a significant difference compares to the mentioned groups, as those living in poverty only took up 6% in total households of the category.
At 12%, couples with children were above the average of poverty rate by 1%, whereas couples with no children were noticeably lower, at 7%. Old couples were considered the most economic-efficient group as their poverty rate was only 4%.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, whereas, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 872.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22155688623 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03850768537 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62874251497 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4851838374 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212899235506 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105125201543 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118077529792 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164624517401 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142840704895 0.0819641961636 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.