The table represents British adults’ and children’s income distribution to a range of popular components, including food, electronic equipment, music, and videos in 1998.
Overall, most of the aforementioned categories occupied a larger proportion of children’ earnings than of adults’ ones, making an exception of food. Furthermore, there was a difference in male and female ways of allocating their budgets on separate items.
Accounting for 39%, music was the largest components of children spendings, in which the proportion between boys and girls were nearly the same (at 38% and 40% respectively). Meanwhile, this figure for adults was eight-fold lower, with no difference between men and women. In contrast to children, mature people spent more on food than other items. 25% of adults' budget went on food, much higher than that of children (at 10%). Interestingly, in the case of adults, that the female spendings on food tripled male ones, was recorded whereas there was a marginal disparity of 2% in children's case.
Regarding electronic equipment, this component constituted the second largest proportion of children income, but witnessed the most enormous divergence between boys and girls, with boys allocating 18% of earnings to this item, in comparison with girls at only 5%. Despite a comparatively lower percentage in case of adults, a similar variance was seen, with 10% for male citizens and 1% for female ones. Relating to videos, children spent 12% of the budget on these categories, compared to adults with merely 1%. However, while boys and girls represented an equal proportion of videos expenditure, men surpassed women by exactly 4 times.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 478, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t 12% of the budget on these categories, compared to adults with merely 1%. Howev...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, regarding, second, so, whereas, while, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1421.0 965.302439024 147% => OK
No of words: 262.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42366412214 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07595938446 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 106.607317073 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580152671756 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 283.868780488 152% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0993041918 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.416666667 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.08333333333 5.23603664747 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0871798455118 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0327483649695 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0341386877953 0.0843802449381 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0619095847764 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358149814597 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 40.7170731707 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.