The pie charts below show the spending of a school in the UK from 1981 to 2001.
The graphs represent the spending distribution of a particular school in Britain between 1981 and 2001.
Overall, despite fluctuating on a different scale, the proportion of teachers’ salaries, furniture and equipment, and Insurance increased, whereas that of resources and other workers’ salaries decreased. Furthermore, teachers’ salaries consisted of the largest proportion while insurance comprised the smallest one.
Teachers’ salaries were the major spending of this school, which occupied 40% in 1981, rose dramatically and making up half in 1991 before witnessing a moderate decrease of 5% in the next decade. Similarly, despite plunging by 10% from 1981 to 1991, the figure for furniture and equipment soared by 18%, leading this item to become the second largest spending in 2001. Insurance which accounted for the smallest percentage of school spending, have a consistent increase from merely 2% to 8% over 20 years.
The reversed pattern was reflected in others. Accounting for 28% of total spending in 1981, other workers’ salaries underwent a significant decline in the distribution, by 13% in 2001. After a considerate rise by 5% in the first decade, the proportion of resource plummeted to only 9% in the next 10 years.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, second, similarly, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.48453608247 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 32.9175257732 9% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 26.3917525773 144% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.85567010309 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1071.0 937.175257732 114% => OK
No of words: 193.0 206.0 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54922279793 4.54256449028 122% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.78020617076 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22894803284 2.54303337028 127% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 127.690721649 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59067357513 0.622605031667 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 311.4 290.88556701 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.13402061856 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 0.824742268041 728% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6804123711 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 16.3608247423 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.7809414312 44.8134815571 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 76.5299724578 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 16.8248392259 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 4.34317383033 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 7.41237113402 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.94845360825 127% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202052253323 0.216113520407 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0887772111126 0.0766984524023 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0875087328101 0.0603063233224 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141321925405 0.12726935374 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101110995946 0.0580467560999 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 8.37731958763 184% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 70.7449484536 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 7.45979381443 154% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 8.71597938144 171% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 7.59969072165 125% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 41.2886597938 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 8.62886597938 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 8.54432989691 122% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 8.15463917526 147% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.