A prolonged absence from compulsory schooling without approval could severely impact on children’s future and the whole community. The subsequent paragraphs will discuss the roots of this situation and possible consequences.
The causes of school truancy seem to derive from both internal and external sources. An internal underlying factor is probably because children lose interest in school, which can result from several factors like rigid curricula, dull flows of lessons or poor instruction. A depiction of this personal excuse is pupils’ frequent avoidance of specific lessons given by certain teachers. Relating to external ones, we should mention peer influence, according to which children tend to follow their peers who play truant frequently. This might be explained that children would like to be accepted by their friends more than rewarded for their excellent academic performance or improvement.
Regarding possible effects, the most likely one is that school absenteeism can cause severe academic underperformance, followed by poorly examining and perhaps, fewer opportunities for progressing careers in the future. Another major effect points to the risk of a rising of juvenile crime, which, sometimes, just arises from youngsters’ temptation to minor crimes or antisocial activities when they are under no supervision. For instance, several cases of criminal trespass have the serious involvement of young vandals, many of who are only truants before entering the criminal path. Those, sitting alongside other delinquency like damaging private properties, littering with trash, or threatening the elderly spread the sense of instability and anxiety, which is a social impact of truancy.
In conclusion, school problems or peer influence can be traced to the general source of truancy and this issue have negative effects on both individuals and society, which is mainly seen in terms of personal underachievement and a high tendency of youth offence.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, regarding, so, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1630.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.78014184397 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04494937798 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.691489361702 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.6389803423 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.181818182 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6363636364 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.18181818182 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118517283623 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0382091717612 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415759975397 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0707085427586 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051903245194 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.54 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.81 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.