The table below gives information about the employment sectors in which people from 3 age groups worked.
The table compares the number of workers in ten different industries, divided into three groups of age.
Overall, the number of people joining the manufacturing, agriculture, local government, and education sectors increase with ages whereas the trend of retail and other ones is reversed, making an exception of catering, health, law, and accountancy.
The manufacturing is the most popular among people over 40, with 23 people recruited, which approximately doubles the number of youngest ones. Similarly, 18 workers of the oldest group of age work in local government, compared to only 8 ones under 25. Education and Agriculture follow a similar pattern, but on a lower scale.
By contrast, retail and other sectors are selected most by the youngest employees. Regarding retails, this group of age gains 23 people, while 13 people are relatively equally divided between two remaining categories. Meanwhile, the number of people working in other industries decrease by age, from 21 people under 25, plunging to 9 ones over 40.
Two aforementioned patterns are not reflected in others. A few more people in the age between 25 and 40 than the number in two other groups of age are employed in catering and health. Meanwhile, three age categories equally contribute 4 people to Law sectors. Conversely, each of youngest and oldest groups has 3 accountants, in comparison with only two people in the rest of ages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 126, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the youngest'.
Suggestion: of the youngest
... which approximately doubles the number of youngest ones. Similarly, 18 workers of the olde...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 335, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... from 21 people under 25, plunging to 9 ones over 40. Two aforementioned patterns ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, if, regarding, similarly, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1189.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19213973799 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93521903177 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572052401747 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 365.4 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.4101489369 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0833333333 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0833333333 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08333333333 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25549602688 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0929853308888 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055064014878 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14624548046 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378445896176 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 40.7170731707 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.