The graph and tables compare typical hospitals in several countries regarding their daily electricity consumption, local emergency calls and minutes fro patient assessment during a week.
Overall, there exists a positive relation/link between electricity use and the number of emergency calls. Hospitals in most countries witness an increase in the patient assessment time, with an exception in Russia.
The number of emergency calls to hospitals in Frane and Japan fluctuates, with 90 and 110 calls per day respectively. Canadian and Russian hospitals experience a dramatic rise of approximately 50 cases weekly while the figure for Argentina consistently decreases.
Electricity consumption and emergency call numbers share the same pattern. The use of electricity in French and Japanese hospitals are stable, with an average of 32mw for the former and 18mw for the latter. Hospitals in Canada and Russia consume more electricity in the last three days, whereas that of hospitals in Argentina declines a half by weekends.
Time for assessment remains the same in most countries, except Russia. Japanese hospitals spend a longer time per assessment (16m per case) than any other countries’ (approximately 12m per case). In Russia, however, assessment time increase sharply by 16m.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 150, Rule ID: FOR_FRO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'for'?
Suggestion: for
...tion, local emergency calls and minutes fro patient assessment during a week. Ove...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, regarding, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1094.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61025641026 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05511072012 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579487179487 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.9345134404 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4545454545 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7272727273 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.09090909091 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234065150833 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0942592634231 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0754920440564 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141310060184 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0776546375706 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 61.2550243902 61% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.96 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.