The table below shows the proportion of pupils attending four types of secondary schools between 2000 and 2009.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The tabular chart illustrates the information about the percentage of four various kinds of secondary schools which attend by children which was in nine years during 2000 and 2009.
In overall, there were lots of transformation can be noticed in students attendance for all secondary schools over the periods. However, only Community schools was more famous for pupils’s attendance in the last year.
It can be seen from the information that voluntary Controlled schools were most popular for attending by students at the beginning of the period which accounted at more than a half (52%) between 2000. After this, it started declined at approximately two-fifth in 2005 and a fifth in 2009. On the other hand, community schools accounted for 12% for children attendance during 2000 and experienced a little less than a three-folds rise to nearly a third between 2005. Likewise, the proportion of pupils who attend community schools increases dramatically and reached to peak level at around three-fifths at the end of the year.
The chart further proves that Specialist schools attained a lowest figure of students attendance in the all given periods. In addition to this, it started from 12% and never grow up from one in ten in given time periods. Even though, only 19% pupils of the total percentage went Grammar schools during 2005. Lastly, in 2000, Grammar schools attend by around a quarter students which declined gradually at two times less at 12% between 2009.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 59, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...proves that Specialist schools attained a lowest figure of students attendance in...
^
Line 13, column 369, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'student'?
Suggestion: student
...mmar schools attend by around a quarter students which declined gradually at two times l...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, lastly, likewise, second, third, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1246.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17012448133 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76672955762 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51867219917 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 352.8 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4432607556 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.272727273 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9090909091 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207220356657 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0870827259575 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462163922099 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142435296661 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0249043375637 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.