The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in different countries in 2000.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The combination of pie chart and bar graph illustrates the information about the terms of percentage of water which expanded by the whole world and four various regions such as China, India, New Zealand and Canada for several purposes during 2000.
In overall, husbandry constituted a major to utilised water since least amount of water was used for domestic sectors. However, there were lots of transformation can be noticed in all areas for using water over the period.
With regards to the pie chart, between 2000, farming was most popular for spending water in the globe which accounted at seven in ten of the total amount. In contrast, only 30% water was expended by industry(22%) and domestic (8%) sectors from specific year.
The bar graph proves that India attained a higher figure to spent water on agriculture at 92% followed by China (69%) and New Zealand (44%) in given year. Whilst, using water for husbandry observed at 8% in Canada. Likewise, the proportion of water utilised on domestic works were found 46%(New Zealand), 12%(Canada), 9%(China) and 5(India) respectively during 2000. Lastly, China, New Zealand and India accounted for a fifth for spending water on domestic works and experienced a four-folds rise to four-fifths in particular year in Canada.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, lastly, likewise, as for, in contrast, in particular, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1066.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.125 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63271969981 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596153846154 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5373593627 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.444444444 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.22222222222 5.23603664747 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158287464998 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754234627833 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430774216557 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113748744925 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0353421465797 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.