The table below shows the results of a survey of average number of cars per hour using three suburban during working hours instead ten year pollution monitoring program traffic calming was introduced in Harper lane at the beginning of 1999.
The given tabular layout produces the information about that ten years pollution monitoring programme introduce of traffic calming by survey is conducted average number of cars per hour during working hours to into three suburban highways in 1999. It is clear and coherent representation.
Overall, it is evident that the ratio is cars per hour data maximum of great York way rather than all others.
Firstly, the data was celebrating of ten countury as well as three suburban roadways were also used in this process. Moreover, the other one suitable ways used that was traffic calming.however, In 1993- 1997 was data 82%,100%,386%,544%,654% of Harper lane. Although, long lane amount was 400%,450%,600%,800%,638% respectively.
Secondly, another countury of data fluctuate through traffic calming. Because this is the method of slow the traffic rush.furthermore, great York way inclined dramatically into a single row. On moving, other two suburban roadways have data fluctuate either incline or decline.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ten years pollution monitoring programme introduce of traffic calming by survey i...
^^^
Line 1, column 188, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onducted average number of cars per hour during working hours to into three subu...
^^
Line 1, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f cars per hour during working hours to into three suburban highways in 1999. It...
^^
Line 5, column 277, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...654% of Harper lane. Although, long lane amount was 400%,450%,600%,800%,638% resp...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 864.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64705882353 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.54409919027 2.65546596893 133% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.679738562092 0.547539520022 124% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.4030583777 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2222222222 5.23603664747 195% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340833759242 0.215688989381 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109723825054 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.142189119821 0.0843802449381 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193602250885 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.160269173094 0.0819641961636 196% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.19 11.4140731707 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.