The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 and 2010 about one university.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table shows the feedback of the students of a university regarding school facilities and learning plan in 2000, 2005 and 2010.
Overall, most of the entries have been stable over the given period with the exception of the electronic resources and the courses available. In addition, the item concerning buildings facilities remained unchanged at every survey at 77%.
The most noticeable feature is the sharp rise the surveys highlight for electronic resources, which from 45% of the votes in 2000, gained the 27% the following time and finally attained the peak of the preferences with 88%. No other category had such a high percentage with the exception of the print resources which were evaluated positively from the 87% of the students in 2000, obtained slightly more in 2005 and then dropped to 88% in 2010.
Moreover, as opposed to other sections which all gained votes from 2000 to 2010, the range of the modules offered by the university is the only aspect which has not increased, rather it has gradually gone down from 32% in 2000, then 30% as for 2005 and, ultimately 27% in 2010.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 103, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to plan'
Suggestion: to plan
...egarding school facilities and learning plan in 2000, 2005 and 2010. Overall, most...
^^^^
Line 2, column 69, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
... have been stable over the given period with the exception of the electronic resources and the course...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 270, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...her category had such a high percentage with the exception of the print resources which were evaluate...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, moreover, regarding, so, then, as for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 916.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89839572193 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56936151144 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582887700535 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.1490740673 43.030603864 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.666666667 112.824112599 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.1666666667 22.9334400587 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.83333333333 5.23603664747 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135417994193 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698895738103 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576668461946 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0928662690726 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575871108904 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.2329268293 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.