The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone call in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.
Summarise the information by selecting a reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart presents the time spent on the telephone in the UK from 1995 to 2002, considering three types of line: local (fixed line), national and overseas (fixed line) and mobile (all calls).
Overall, the local fixed line was the most used throughout the period by the Birtish. However, national and international calls, as well as mobile calls, increased year on year abbreviating the gap with local line.
Time spent on local calls fluctuated from 70 billions of minutes until the peak of 90 billions of minutes in 1999. After that, it gradually decreased to the original amount of 70 billions of minutes by 2002.
On the other hand, national and international fixed line show an upward trend over the period, starting from around 40 billions and less than 5 billion respectively in 1995 to 60 billions for the former and almost 45 billions for the latter in 2002. In addiction, the usage of mobiles quadrupled from 1999 to 2002.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 43, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '70 billion'.
Suggestion: 70 billion
...me spent on local calls fluctuated from 70 billions of minutes until the peak of 90 billions o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 84, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '90 billion'.
Suggestion: 90 billion
...0 billions of minutes until the peak of 90 billions of minutes in 1999. After that, it gradual...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 177, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '70 billion'.
Suggestion: 70 billion
...lly decreased to the original amount of 70 billions of minutes by 2002. On the other hand, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, well, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 778.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8625 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5518375732 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56875 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 223.2 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.0761421626 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.142857143 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189100609489 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0887269901741 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611187241779 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116220895838 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680961745328 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.