The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone call in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.
Summarise the information by selecting a reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
A glance to the bar graph provided shows the comparassion between local calls (fixed line), national and international calls (fixed line) and all mobile calls in the UK since 1995 until 2002. Overall, the minutes of telephone calls in total increased from around 110 minutes to 175 minutes - both in billions.
The numbers of mobile calls in minutes increased considerably from the year 1999 to the year 2002. In 1999, the minutes were around 10 billions while in 2002 the number of minutes were more than 40 billions. The national and international calls (fixed line) went up slightly from 1995 to 2002. The total increase represents around 20 billions of minutes over the time period. The local calls (fixed line) were the most relevant numbers compared with the two other categories. However, despite the peak in 1999, which represents 90 billions of minutes, the local calls (fixed line) decreased after that peak. As a consequence, the numbers of minutes in the end of the period returned to the same numbers in the begin.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 329, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '20 billion'.
Suggestion: 20 billion
...2. The total increase represents around 20 billions of minutes over the time period. The local...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 374, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...llions of minutes over the time period. The local calls fixed line were the most re...
^^^
Line 2, column 524, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '90 billion'.
Suggestion: 90 billion
...pite the peak in 1999, which represents 90 billions of minutes, the local calls fixed line dec...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 642, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...As a consequence, the numbers of minutes in the end of the period returned to the...
^^
Line 2, column 701, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... period returned to the same numbers in the begin.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 845.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88439306358 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51296676893 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.49710982659 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.1604761399 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8888888889 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.55555555556 5.23603664747 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261374470917 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121402033133 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397246880541 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223239148839 0.15604864568 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00122386251827 0.0819641961636 1% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.