In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
Nowadays, infrastructure and transportation are more and more a challenge to countries around the world, specially for those in development. Some people believe that public money should funding modern railways lines to connect cities, while others support the idea that money should be spend to improve the existing public transport. In my opinion, both approaches are required. The purpose of this essay is discuss the topic as well as point out a balance between both positions.
On the one hand, new railway lines for very fast trains allow passengers to travel faster between cities. For instance, in some European countries such as in Spain and in Germany, very fast trains decrease the time required to travel large distances. Moreover, the comfort provided for modern trains during the trip is another positive aspect to be considered.
On the other hand, the investment required to construct new railways could present more results if applied in existing public transport. This second option are more economic and prevent governments and transport companies to spend more unexpected money to maintain this type of transport in long term.
Finally, considering both approaches, I believe that is possible to priorize some relevant projects to construct new railways as well as to improve the existing public transport. Thus, it is possible to combine both positions as a solution to transport and infrastructure.
In conclusion, it is considered by some that governments should spend public money in new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. However, others think public money should funding improvements in the existing public transport. While new railways allow people to travel between cities in less time and more comfortable, improving the existing transport is more economic and an strategy for long term to avoid unexpected costs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 287, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'spent'?
Suggestion: spent
...s support the idea that money should be spend to improve the existing public transpor...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...vant projects to construct new railways as well as to improve the existing public transpor...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 385, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...existing transport is more economic and an strategy for long term to avoid unexpec...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, moreover, second, so, thus, well, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40410958904 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79331998116 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479452054795 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5412261421 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.714285714 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8571428571 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8571428571 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.514578672999 0.244688304435 210% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.18156336019 0.084324248473 215% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136005381054 0.0667982634062 204% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.288294652955 0.151304729494 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109186571545 0.056905535591 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.