In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
In this modern era, mode of transportation has become an increasingly popular and highly debatable topic. It is often argued by a large number of individuals that authorities should spend an aggregate amount of capital for building new rail lines across the cities. However, some others claim that the government should invest in current public transportation rather than new railways. In my opinion, I firmly believe the former view because of several benefits such as low traffic congestion and bolstering the foreign trade relations, and in this essay, I will analyse both sides with proper conclusion.
To commence with, globalization had a great impact on land transportation in this contemporary world. In other words, with the introduction of railway lines, the public was benefited to reduce their commute time, which they can utilize the precious time for other crucial tasks in work or at home. Moreover, innovative freight trains boosted the trading industries by enabling cross-trade among the nations with short transit times and low shipping expenses. So, the introduction of super-fast and fast trains can connect more cities around the country as well as reduce the traffic congestion in cities. To illustrate, one of the most beautiful nations in Europe, in Italy the government bodies had laid new lines for freight transport to connect with more cities around the country for exchanging commodities. Thereby, the national income had risen to a great extent.
On the other hand, the opposite view states to support the other public transport facilities such as buses and cars which are central sources for carbon emissions. The old transport system comprises bus lines where the local communities engage each other within inter-city with less effort. Having said that, high council bodies should enhance the passenger amenities such as quality ride, sophisticated bus-ticketing systems, switching to fuel cell electric buses over conventional buses. As an outcome, passengers attain stress free ride and deduction in the emission of hazardous greenhouse gases incredibly. For instance, China and Japan popularly known for its technical advancement in their daily life activities, the frequency of electronic bus transport has been increased which traverses public with less travel time.
To recapitulate, when it comes to supporting transportation by providing funds from the government, people always divide their opinions. Some claim that it is the best solution to construct new lanes or introduce bullet trains for both faster mobility of passengers as well as goods, whereas others agree to spend lumps of money on monitoring the existing public transport facilities by increasing the frequency and adopting new methodologies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 129, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... debatable topic. It is often argued by a large number of individuals that authorities should sp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 163, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed by a large number of individuals that authorities should spend an aggregate am...
^^
Line 7, column 267, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... for both faster mobility of passengers as well as goods, whereas others agree to spend lu...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, well, whereas, for instance, such as, as well as, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2338.0 1615.20841683 145% => OK
No of words: 425.0 315.596192385 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50117647059 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88512807581 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 176.041082164 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607058823529 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 710.1 506.74238477 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.762602826 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.529411765 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.47058823529 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257456151736 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715665915141 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561202918604 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151542065686 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0339138057535 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 78.4519038076 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.