Nowadays, our life has changed from our ancestor's style and in this modern life, we need some kind of supports, especially from mobility aspects. It is because people become more mobile and active rather than in previous decades. It might be the reason that some people believe to spend large money on new line constructions, which connect different cities, to bolster up the human activities, whilst others think that it is better to use the fund for improving the existing public transports. Therefore in this essay, I will examine both the views and provide a plausible conclusion.
To begin, new rail lines might suit for busy people such as businessman or women. It is because they have dense schedules in different areas. Addition of new lines might have a sophisticated technology that made transporting matters more efficient, convenient and faster. For example, an old train may take 7-8 hours for a journey from Amritsar to Delhi, while a Vande Express (High Speed Train) can take only 4 hours. Hence, this technology can support the modern and busy people to move from one place to another in an efficient way.
On the flip side, not every person support this ideology. It is because there is group of people, who supports that the public funds should be spent on fixing the previous public transports. It might be true as some of the old transportations are still fully functional and only need a little maintenance to be able to accommodate the citizens activities again. For instance, in Pakistan there is a busy way, it has been operated in a decade, but since last year, it began to have many engine problems. Regarding that matter, we can choose to make the repairment work done than buying the new one. Nevertheless, in a short term period, it will start to break down again and if you can sum up the money used for several repair work, it can cost a whole new bus, which is more worth.
In a nutshell, new lines may give some people the opportunity to save a plenty of time and the substantial thing, their time can be allocated to take care some of their business, which what they want, whereas fixing the existing transportation can not fully support our new modern life. Hence, in honest opinion, I would choose that public money should be spent on a new railway that adapts the new technology to adjust to our recent situation.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 495, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...proving the existing public transports. Therefore in this essay, I will examine both the ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 514, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an efficient way" with adverb for "efficient"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...eople to move from one place to another in an efficient way. On the flip side, not every person ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 212, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... public transports. It might be true as some of the old transportations are still fully fun...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, may, nevertheless, regarding, so, still, therefore, whereas, while, for example, for instance, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 7.85571142285 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1948.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 410.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7512195122 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58716458367 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548780487805 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 609.3 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 5.43587174349 294% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.8004378435 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.588235294 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1176470588 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47058823529 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234985809743 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0668124469308 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072459633355 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145323823619 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419012975782 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 495, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...proving the existing public transports. Therefore in this essay, I will examine both the ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 514, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an efficient way" with adverb for "efficient"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...eople to move from one place to another in an efficient way. On the flip side, not every person ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 212, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... public transports. It might be true as some of the old transportations are still fully fun...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, may, nevertheless, regarding, so, still, therefore, whereas, while, for example, for instance, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 7.85571142285 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1948.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 410.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7512195122 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58716458367 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548780487805 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 609.3 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 5.43587174349 294% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.8004378435 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.588235294 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1176470588 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47058823529 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234985809743 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0668124469308 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072459633355 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145323823619 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419012975782 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.