In many countries, people hold a view that it is vital to be allocated budget on establishing fast train trails between cities, while others believe that budget should spend on current public transportation.
The fast commuting between cities is becoming status quo. A large number of people have to travel to cities nearby due to their jobs. For instance, many tutors working in schools live in other cities, thus commuting between cities. In these cases, the fast train allows them to transport easily. In addition, the fastest way to travel is by airplane which consumes gasoline. Burning gasoline emits carbon monoxide degrading the environment, thus protecting the environment necessary to establish fast train rails because it uses electricity which is harnessed by solar powerplants that do not have detrimental effects on the environment.
The public transport system should be more effective. In the megacities, there is bumper-to-bumper traffic all day long. To alleviate traffic congestion, public transportation should be improved by the governments. If people have access to an easy way to commute, they will not use private cars. Therefore, the intensity of traffic jams will decrease. Furthermore, the low quality of some public transportation services like the city train deters people to opt for it. For example, the trains are packed time; consequently, numerous people do not tolerate the crowd and congestion, so they prefer to get in their car.
In conclusion, I believe that it is mandatory to spend money on transportation not only inner cities but also between cities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space after the opening parenthesis
Suggestion: [
[ Monday, November 15, 2021 12:24 PM ] Moh...
^^
Line 1, column 37, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the closing parenthesis
Suggestion: ]
[ Monday, November 15, 2021 12:24 PM ] Mohsen Hamzeh: In many countries, peopl...
^^
Line 2, column 58, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: Many; Numerous
... between cities is becoming status quo. A large number of people have to travel to cities nearby ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1388.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33846153846 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98610889581 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.623076923077 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 65.5314682678 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5333333333 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33090785321 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0992738875113 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0713239952714 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18709050066 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.017735098215 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.