the table below shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 and 2010 about one university.
A glance at the table provided reveals the results of three surveys about changing students' mind in terms of discrepancy facets of the provisions at an undetermined university, conducted between 2000 and 2010. Overall, it can be seen both teaching quality and electronic resources have upward trends, the range of modules offered has a downward trend, and teaching facilities remained steadily. The lowest rating is related to the range of modules offered and the maximum rating is pertained to print resources over the period given.
According to the table, the teaching quality stood at 65 in 2000, reduced by 2% in 2005 and then grew to 69% in 2010. Moreover, the print resources increased gradually from 87 % in 2000 to 89 % in 2005. Afterward, it declined by 1% at 88% in 2010. The electronic resources surged exponentially from 45% in 2000 to 72% in 2005 and reached a peak of 88% in 2010. The range of modules offered reduced moderately from 32% in 2000 to 30% in 2005 and continued this way at 27% in 2010. The teaching facilities remained steadily at 77% over the period.
It is interesting to note that both the print and electronic resources hit the highest point at 88% in 2010. The range of modules offered had the lowest proportion over the period, from 2000 to 2010. The teaching facilities had three periods of plateaus and were the second highest between 2000 and 2010, as well. What is more, Electronic resources fluctuated widely among all of the materials.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 481, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... and continued this way at 27% in 2010. The teaching facilities remained steadily a...
^^^
Line 3, column 373, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ronic resources fluctuated widely among all of the materials.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, second, so, then, well, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1224.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 253.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83794466403 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68118883122 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490118577075 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 349.2 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.3848881606 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1538461538 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.53846153846 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222795213381 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0849802972026 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0757965585696 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151288073535 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0353782209295 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.