The table below shows social and economic indicators for four countries in 1994, according to United Nations statistics.Describe the information shown below in your own words. What implications do the indicators have for the countries?You should write at

Essay topics:

The table below shows social and economic indicators for four countries in 1994, according to United Nations statistics.

Describe the information shown below in your own words. What implications do the indicators have for the countries?

You should write at least 150 words.

The table displays the figures of United Nations in terms ofthe social and economic situations in four countries including Canada, Japan, Peru and Zaire in 1994.

Overall, there are two distinguishing groups: higher living conditions as Japan and Canada and less sufficiency like Peru and Zaire when it comes to both financial and educational issues.

As can be observed from the statistics, people in Canada earned more than $11,000 in 1994, and Japanese came before it with $15,700 at the same year. However, in Peru and Zaire, this amount was considerably lower, especially Zaire people with over 10 times less than Japanese. Speaking of life length, Japanese once again led the table with 78 years, wherease Zaire people stood in the last place with merely 47 years.

In relation to nutrition aborbed by each person, this time Canadian occupied the first position with 3326 calories and the last one belonged to Zaire with 1749 calories. Educationally, the proportion of literacy of adults in Canada and Japan respectively the highest with 99 percent. In contrast, in Zaire, this kind of date was account for only 34 percent which made this country owned the lowest percentage in education.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 228, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Zaire) must be used with a third-person verb: 'peoples'.
Suggestion: peoples
...as considerably lower, especially Zaire people with over 10 times less than Japanese. ...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, whereas, in contrast, kind of, speaking of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1013.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16836734694 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57069960513 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.668367346939 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.3494966386 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 126.625 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 5.23603664747 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100236568751 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0469946025874 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687418096985 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0740104231486 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0790044527308 0.0819641961636 96% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.