The table below delineates information about manufactured mobile phone market contain share of world wide market in the given years 2005 and 2006.
Overall, it is explicitly that a shar shot up was accounted in the Nokia market share nearly one third in the year 2005 and 35% in the 2006.However, a tiny fraction was noticed in the BeQ mobile.
Now turning back to details, after that Motorola up lift his lead in 2005 and comprised to 17.7% whereas in 2006 it move up word respectively 21%. Moreover, in Samsung a growth was manifested in the year 2005 of 12.7% while in the year 2006 Samsung fail to hold the growth and fall to 11.8%.Furthermore there is a minimal growth seen in the Sony with 6.3% in the year 2005 and 7.4% in the year 2006.
Moving further, in LG both the given years approximately un change growth was accounted in the other 19.2% in the year 2005 and 16.2% manifested in the year 2006 moving towards total of all mobile companies in both given years is 100.0%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: worldwide
...ed mobile phone market contain share of world wide market in the given years 2005 and 2006...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: WORLD_WIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worldwide'?
Suggestion: worldwide
...ed mobile phone market contain share of world wide market in the given years 2005 and 2006...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 12, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... given years 2005 and 2006. Overall, it is explicitly that a shar shot up was ac...
^^
Line 2, column 141, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...rd in the year 2005 and 35% in the 2006.However, a tiny fraction was noticed in the BeQ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 117, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'moves'?
Suggestion: moves
...d comprised to 17.7% whereas in 2006 it move up word respectively 21%. Moreover, in ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 291, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Furthermore
...il to hold the growth and fall to 11.8%.Furthermore there is a minimal growth seen in the S...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 291, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...il to hold the growth and fall to 11.8%.Furthermore there is a minimal growth seen in the S...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 809.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.54494382022 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58178312226 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52808988764 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.3062072401 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.8 112.824112599 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.6 22.9334400587 155% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2 5.23603664747 233% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.385140307199 0.215688989381 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.227292412603 0.103423049105 220% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.18020656909 0.0843802449381 214% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.268846192834 0.15604864568 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.178151592398 0.0819641961636 217% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.33 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.