The table gives statistics showing the aspects of quality of life in five countries.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Given is the table depicting the living standards in terms of GNP, daily calorie supply, life span and infant mortality in five distinct countries, namely Bangladesh, Bolivia, Egypt, Indonesia and the USA in 1992.
It is conspicuous that the Americans had the best quality of life in five regions with the highest GNP per person, calorie supply, life expectancy and the lowest infant death rate, while the reverse was true for Bangladesh.
Bangladesh had the lowest income with 140 dollars per person lower approximately tenfold than that of the USA. Additionally, the level of income in the three remaining countries fluctuated from 570 to 690. Nevertheless, the infant mortality in Bangladesh was the highest rate with 132 cases per 1000 live births and the second-highest position belonged to Bolivia with 124 death cases. By contrast, babies dead in America account for 12 cases.
When it comes to the number of calories supplied per day and life span, the USA took the lead with 3653 calories per person and 74 years on average, followed by Egypt. Indonesia people were provided higher calories but the live expectancy was lower one year than Bolivia. Perceptibly, the bottom position was held by Bangladesh.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, nevertheless, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1020.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1256281407 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67835896159 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597989949749 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.0224237933 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.333333333 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0631743035613 0.215688989381 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0258607002829 0.103423049105 25% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0346683653938 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0503450232407 0.15604864568 32% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358924510949 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.