The two pie charts below show some employment patterns in Great Britain in 1992. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Given are the two pie charts delineating the rate of employment in manual and non-manual of two individual genders in Great Britain in 1992.
It is perceptible that for females, the Clerical or related in the non-manual pattern was the highest rate and the opposite was true for General laborers which were also the same for male, yet the highest percentage was Managerial and professional.
In terms of the non-manual pattern in the employment rate, Clerical or related for women was the highest rate with 31% while for men, it was only 6%. Meanwhile, the Managerial and professional accounted for the second-highest place with only 29% for females and 36% for males, which was the lead of the chart. Other non-manual was the last one with 9% for women and 3% less for men.
When it comes to the manual rate of employment, for females, Other manuals had the highest percentage with 27%, which was true for males but 1% less followed by Craft or similar with only 3% for women but it was 24% for men. The last one was General laborers with only 1% for females and that rate only increased by 1% for males.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the two pie charts delineating the rate...
^^^
Line 1, column 142, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...idual genders in Great Britain in 1992. It is perceptible that for females, the ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 920.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67005076142 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56619946223 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.446700507614 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.5198279921 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.428571429 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1428571429 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0567485208722 0.215688989381 26% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0476680121811 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.083662994593 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0742730383004 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101547138803 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.