The two pie charts below show some employment patterns in Great Britain in 1992. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Given are the two pie charts delineating the proportion of employment patterns in manual and non-manual between two genders in Great Britain in 1992.
It is conspicuous that the non-manual fields ( managerial and professional, clerical or related, and other non-manual) attract more female employees than males while the reverse was true for manual jobs ( craft or similar, general laborers and other manuals).
When it comes to the rate of manual employment of females, general laborers consisted of only 1% which is 2% higher than craft and similar. That number of other manual jobs was much better with 27% reported. In terms of that pattern of males, general laborers contained the fewest with only one-fiftieth percent. It seems that craft or similar and other manual sectors are commonly interested by males with 24% and 26% respectively.
Regarding the figure for non-manual jobs done by females, clerical or related occupied most with 31% surveyed. Following that were managerial and professional with 29% and other non-manual with 9%. In comparison with females’ rates, males perceptibly had lower percentages, managerial and professional consisted most with 36%, followed by two other sectors with only six times fewer.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the two pie charts delineating the prop...
^^^
Line 3, column 45, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s conspicuous that the non-manual fields managerial and professional, clerical or...
^^
Line 3, column 201, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ile the reverse was true for manual jobs craft or similar, general laborers and o...
^^
Line 6, column 201, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...th 29% and other non-manual with 9%. In comparison with females’ rates, males perceptibly ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1045.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44270833333 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80507797692 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557291666667 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9370918436 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.111111111 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0783051482661 0.215688989381 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.042664267882 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0853328781719 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0824330704724 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114325836383 0.0819641961636 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.