The table illustrates the percentage of male and female in terms of weight in Vietnam from 1999 to 2009.
The table illustrates the percentage of male and female in terms of weight in Vietnam from 19The table gives information about changes in the weight of men and women, divided into three categories, in Vietnam during the period from 1999 to 2009.
Overall, there were general upward trends in the proportions of men and women who were at normal weight, whereas the figure for overweight people experienced a reverse pattern. It is also clear that there was no change in underweight women compared to a slight decrease in men.
In 1999, 43% of Vietnamese females had normal body weight, followed by that of males, at 48%. In the following ten years, the percentages of these two groups increased gradually to 56% for the former and 54% for the latter.
Overweight women accounted for 28% in the first period before decreasing about twofold to 15% in the next decade. In comparison, there was also a steady drop of 3% in both overweight and underweight men, from 26% to 23%. Over the given period, the rate of Vietnamese females who were underweight remained stable at 29%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-29 | denistran85 | 78 | view |
| 2021-02-13 | denistran85 | 79 | view |
- The chart below shows the expenditure on three categories with different proportions among residents in the UK 76
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 78
- The graph shows the percentage of university students in 18 25 years old in four countries between 1961 and 2011 84
- The two maps compare the changes of a school campus from 1985 to 2012 47
- The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 894.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85869565217 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62404902209 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597826086957 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3077073083 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.75 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321622752881 0.215688989381 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120196398477 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.20441413659 0.0843802449381 242% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211767477864 0.15604864568 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.254675440659 0.0819641961636 311% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.