The table shows the amount of coal used by different by different sectors in the UK from 1975 to 2000.
The table shows the amount of coal used by different by different sectors in the UK from 1975 to 2000.
Overall, it is obvious that the coal consumption experienced a significant decline for all sectors from 1975 to 2000 with an exception for power stations in first given period.
Having started at 77.2 million tones in 1975, the coal used for Power stations accounted for two-thirds of the total Coal consumption. However, this figure had an upward trend to 89.6 million tones in 1980, before witnessing a gradual decrease to 47.1 millions tones in 2000. In addition, it was still the leading sector for using coal in all four categories in 2000.
As can be seen from the table, Domestic and Industry in the UK contributed to nearly a quarter of the total quantity in 1975 with over 39 million tones respectively and it was less than for Services, at only 4.2 million tones. Afterwards, the coal consumption of this three sectors fell remarkably until the year 2000, although there was no change throughout five years from 1990 to 1995 for Domestic (2.7 millions tones) and next 5 years for Services (0.6 million tones)
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 41, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'by different'.
Suggestion: by different
...The table shows the amount of coal used by different by different sectors in the UK from 1975 to 2000. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, still, third, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 934.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81443298969 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55468410634 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577319587629 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.7131458846 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.428571429 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7142857143 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362925088338 0.215688989381 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.238877118748 0.103423049105 231% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.314444794247 0.0843802449381 373% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.358522614201 0.15604864568 230% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.370915765594 0.0819641961636 453% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.