The shown data table demonstrates the comparison between men and women by the average salary per week of five jobs in 2015.
Overall, it can be seen that the man’s wage was considerably higher than the woman's wage in the same job. In addition, the payment was relatively varied according to the occupation.
Regarding the professionals and technicians, the both man and woman’s earnings in the field of professionals was the highest payment in the list with $2000 for man and $1900 for woman. Simultaneously, the technicians' salary was noticeably lower than that of professionals, $1400 was recorded for man, $500 higher than woman with only $900.
In terms of remaining occupation, the payments for administrative/clerical workers and service workers was quite similar with $1350 and 1300$ respectively. It also happened with women, $1000 was paid for administrative/clerical workers, just $50 higher than that of service workers with $950. However, the manual laborers had the lowest wage in the list with $1100 for the man and $850 for the woman.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 202, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'technicians'' or 'technician's'?
Suggestion: technicians'; technician's
... and 900 for woman. Simultaneously, the technicians salary was noticeably lower than that o...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 135, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$1300'.
Suggestion: $1300
... workers was quite similar with 350 and 1300$ respectively. It also happened with wom...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, regarding, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 873.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13529411765 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.43384840651 2.65546596893 129% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564705882353 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.3126871252 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.125 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0836509334623 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0499630055922 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106875791462 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.091721598737 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137787016518 0.0819641961636 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.