The table shows the changes in waste production in three different countries over the three years. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant.
The given table demonstrates the amount of waste produced in three nations (namely Ireland, Japan, and Korea) over a 20-year period starting from 1980.
Overall, it is evident from the statistics that Japan is the country where wastes were released the most over the given course, whereas the opposite is true for Ireland.
In 1980, 28 million tons of waste were reported in Japan, ranking first among other nations. In stark contrast, the amount of waste produced in Ireland at the same time was significantly lower than that, registering at just 0,6 million, while no information was reported in Korea.
By 1990, there had been a slight increase of 4 million in the amount of waste produced in Japan, nearly equal to the figure for Korea at that time, which is 31. Again, the data is not available for Ireland. Regarding the following ten years, while both Japan and Ireland experienced a considerable rise in waste production to over 50 and 5 million tonnes respectively, the trend was the opposite concerning Korea, managing to cut down the waste output by 12 million tons.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 896.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89617486339 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.566689411 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612021857923 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.5638427908 43.030603864 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.0 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1428571429 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153634566409 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722805111421 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516351881302 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106815046685 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399723253504 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.