The table shows the expenditure on various types of food in one European country in 1992, 2002 and 2012
The table gives information about the amount of money which was spent on distinct types of food and beverages in Europe in 1992, 2002 and 2012.
Overall, European residents spent the highest amount of money on beef and chicken. In contrast, coffee and butter/margarine were two types of food had the lowest expense in 1992, 2002 and 2012.
In 1992, the European citizens spent 45 and 38 millions of euros on the beef and chick, which were higher than that of the potatoes, at only 11 millions of euros. Although the budget which was spent on the potatoes had an gradually increase and reached 18 million euros in 2012, the figure of the potatoes was still lower than those of beef and chicken, at 54 and 56 million euros in the same year, respectively.
Two types of beverages included coffee and milk took Europe 9 and 13 million euros, respectively, which is higher than the budget spent on butter and margarine, at only 8 million euros. While people in European countries witnessed a decreasing trend of expenditure on the coffee from 9 million euros in 1992 to only 7 million euros in 2012, the expenditure onthe milk slight rose to 14 millions of euros. From 1992 to 2012, the figure of butter and margarine did not fluctuate, at 8 millions of euros.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 45, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '38 million'.
Suggestion: 38 million
...992, the European citizens spent 45 and 38 millions of euros on the beef and chick, which were...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 142, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '11 million'.
Suggestion: 11 million
...gher than that of the potatoes, at only 11 millions of euros. Although the budget which was s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 221, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...get which was spent on the potatoes had an gradually increase and reached 18 milli...
^^
Line 5, column 221, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('gradually') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
...get which was spent on the potatoes had an gradually increase and reached 18 million euros in 2012, t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 384, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '14 million'.
Suggestion: 14 million
...e expenditure onthe milk slight rose to 14 millions of euros. From 1992 to 2012, the figure of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 482, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '8 million'.
Suggestion: 8 million
...ter and margarine did not fluctuate, at 8 millions of euros.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, still, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1043.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6981981982 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56526291383 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.454954954955 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.5988702673 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.375 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.75 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218150681544 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11932150288 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0908608659982 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172286257101 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0834002546619 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.