The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The table illustrates the area of land under forests in million hectares in six different regions of the world during 1990, 2000 and 2005. Overall, the forest area is found to be highest in 1990.

In the year 1990, Europe had the highest area under forests followed by South America, with 989 and 946 million hectares respectively, whereas 749 million hectares of forest area is in Africa. North America and Asia had 708 and 576 million hectares of land under forests. On contrast, Oceania had the lowest area under forest, with only 199 million hectares of land.

It is evident from the table that, the area under forest had decreased from 1990 to 2005 except in Europe and Asia, where the forest area gradually increased. It raised from 989 in 2001 to 1001 in 2005 in Europe and from 576 in 1990 to 584 in 2005. In North America and Oceania, the forest area is found to be more or less constant from 1990 to 2005, in the range of 197-199 million hectares.

It can be concluded that Europe had a vast area under forests, while Oceania had less forest area.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 57, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...rates the area of land under forests in million hectares in six different regions of th...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, while, more or less

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 878.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59685863874 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.18950851433 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.465968586387 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2762449244 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5555555556 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170735558693 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0992716222102 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.073007945361 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122610637633 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0741561990623 0.0819641961636 90% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.