The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The table compares six different countries in terms of their forested land in three seperated years
overall, the amount of forested land in four out of six countries decreased. The vast majority of forested land came from Europe
in 1990, about 990 million of hectares were found in Europe, before rising minimally to over 1000 millions of hectars in 2005. By contrast, the figure for Asia was significantly lower , at approximately 576 million of hecrares in 1990. In 2005 , Asia witnessed an slow increase of well under 10 miliion of hectares in the amount of forested land.
Reverse trend was seen in other countries, in 1990, around 946 million of hectares went to South Ameria, which was over 4 times as much as that of Oceania. The figures for North America and Africa were roughtly 708 and 749 million of hectares respectively. From 1990 to 2005, there was an slight decline in the amount of forested land in North America and Oceania. By 2005, the amount of forested land in South America had considerably fell to just over 880 million of hectares compared to just 691 that of in Africa
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Overall
...rested land in three seperated years overall, the amount of forested land in four ou...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...ty of forested land came from Europe in 1990, about 990 million of hectares wer...
^^
Line 5, column 94, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '1000 million'.
Suggestion: 1000 million
...Europe, before rising minimally to over 1000 millions of hectars in 2005. By contrast, the figur...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 184, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... figure for Asia was significantly lower , at approximately 576 million of hecrare...
^^
Line 5, column 245, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...76 million of hecrares in 1990. In 2005 , Asia witnessed an slow increase of well...
^^
Line 5, column 263, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ares in 1990. In 2005 , Asia witnessed an slow increase of well under 10 miliion ...
^^
Line 7, column 172, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...much as that of Oceania. The figures for North America and Africa were roughtly 7...
^^
Line 7, column 288, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...pectively. From 1990 to 2005, there was an slight decline in the amount of foreste...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 915.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81578947368 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54221625718 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547368421053 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.5911379979 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.375 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 5.23603664747 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171622017898 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.080795796675 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397661536313 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114857512085 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0137920228959 0.0819641961636 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.