The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The table delivers information about forest areas in different global regions, measured in millions of hectares, in three given years.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that Europe had the most forested land while this fugures of Oceania was the least in size throughout the period. In addition, Africa and South America experienced a downward trend in lands used for growing trees whereas other continents witnessed either a fluctuation or an increase.
In 1990, Europe held the largest forested space of 989 millions ha and this number rose to 1001 millions ha 15 years afterwards. In the same year, Oceania only possessed about one fifth of Europe's trees land and had a small dip of 1 million ha in both 2000 and 2005.
Interestingly, Africa underwent a dramatic decrease which added up to 49 millions ha. South America experienced the same trend as Africa. Furthermore, Asia's forest area was fluctuated until stood at 584 millions ha in 2005. North America also dropped about 3 millions ha in three given years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 130, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...o 1001 millions ha 15 years afterwards. In the same year, Oceania only possessed a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, look, so, whereas, while, as for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 879.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08092485549 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69443536892 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658959537572 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.5079941728 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6666666667 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 5.23603664747 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150825606819 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0651468275879 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482919714005 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103921725103 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046000465819 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.