IELTS writing task 1
The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain. The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The demonstrated graphics indicated roots of police fundings as well as shares of spending aspects from a police budget in Britain for 2 years. Overall, the police was funded profoundly by the national government and the most expenditure came from employees' wages.
On the one hand, looking at the authorities' budget, it can be implied that the national government sponsorship contributed a largest amount of money, in particular, 175,5m in 2017 and a slight rise of 2,3m in 2018. Contrastly, other sources of police budget such as grants only brings about 38m, which is the lowest amount in comparison to other sources. However, another source of police funds, local taxes, experienced a dramatic increase of roughly 11,2%, from 91,2m in 2017 to 102,3 in 2018.
On the other hand, the police spendings on this budget was mainly on salaries for officers and staff. This accounted for 75% of total spendings and dropped to 69% in 2018. Silmutaneously, buildings and transport was invested in with a considerable amount of 17% of total budget. This static remain unchanged until 2018. Technology expense, remarkably, witnessed an up-spend from 8% to 14% of police total funds.
In conclusion, the cops budget input was largly came from governement support and the police spent the most of their budget on paying off their employees. Otherwise, there is an outstanding increase in taxes income and technology expenditure.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 124, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...onal government sponsorship contributed a largest amount of money, in particular,...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, look, so, well, in conclusion, in particular, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1200.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21739130435 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84556498355 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586956521739 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 345.6 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.4568751753 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1666666667 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 5.23603664747 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199608479387 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0727195183324 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0379994577991 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122031783881 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216089575959 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 40.7170731707 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.