The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The diagram illustrates the forest area in millions of hectares in several locations all over the world over the fifteen-year period.
It is noticeable that the trends of forested land in six areas remained relatively stable. While Africa and South America showed their dramatic decrease in the forest area, a minimal increase saw in that of Asia and Europe areas in three-year 1990, 2000 and 2005.
Within 10 years from 1990 to 2000, a dramatic decline in forested land in Africa and South America saw by 40 million hectares and 42 million hectares respectively. In contrast, Europe lands saw a forested extension with a significant growth from 989 to 998 million ha. Furthermore, other areas in the world fell gradually by 1 to 6 million hectares.
After 5 years from 2000, while Africa and South America locations constantly reduced in forested lands by 20 and 22 million hectares respectively, Asia areas rose remarkably again by 14 million hectares. However, other three areas such as Europe, North America and Oceania experienced their sustainable remaining or just slowly jumped up only 1 or 3 million hectares until 2005.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 240, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sted extension with a significant growth from 989 to 998 million ha. Furthermore,...
^^
Line 4, column 212, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y again by 14 million hectares. However, other three areas such as Europe, North ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, while, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 947.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09139784946 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75559007826 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569892473118 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0132047695 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.375 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187306275156 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0993251359454 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.036195986818 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129789570795 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398970525474 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.