The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.
Summarise the informaton by selectng and reportng the main features, and make
comparisons where relevant.
The given table illustrates the area of forest in 6 regions of the world in millions of hectares during the period of 1990 and 2005.
As can be seen from the table, the forest areas in Africa, North America, South America and Oceania witnessed a downward trend while that of Asia and Europe experienced the opposite trend. It is also evident that Europe had the largest forest area among all studied regions.
In 1990, Europe had 989 millions of hectares of forest, which rose and peaked at 1001 in 2005. Likewise, Asian forest saw a considerable surge from 576 in 1990 to 584 in 2005.
On contrast, there is a precipitous fall of 58 million hectares in African forest area, levelling off at 691 in 2005. Similarly, South America areas of forest started at 946 million hectares in 1990, at which the figure displayed a plunge to 882 million hectares. North America and Oceania demonstrated a marginal decrease in forested land, reaching each lowest point of 705 and 197 million hectares respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 21, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '989 million'.
Suggestion: 989 million
...l studied regions. In 1990, Europe had 989 millions of hectares of forest, which rose and peak...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, likewise, similarly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 834.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8488372093 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57139798843 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581395348837 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6978025241 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.25 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175610953724 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0914886153712 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532438409533 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121714380871 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0609359313415 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.