In many countries, the costs of living are rising. What are the effects on individuals and society? Suggest solutions to this problem.
There is no doubt that the expenditures of living has displayed a surge in a host of countries. This trend has directly affect everyone, on personal level as well as the community, however, this can be solved by various measures.
The rise of living costs definitely have an impact on both individuals and the society. The most significant effect is that it creates financial burden. The example can be seen in single households since they may not be able to afford all the bills by themselves. Unfortunately, this can trigger a growth in homeless people, poverty rate and even the crime rate. Another difficulty resulted from this is that less money is allovocated on recreational activities such as travelling or going to cinemas. Consequently, a host of industries namely film industries or tourism have to suffer from a plummet of sale, which adversely affect the staffs and the national economy.
Fortunately, there are diversified remedies to resolve this problems. One of the most recommended solutions is that the government has to control the cost of essential goods such as food and clothes as well as the price of accommodation. This can be achieved by making laws on the prices of the products and quotations of the services. For the poor, the authorities should subsidize part of their expenses. For instance, the discount programs for only the poor in education will help more of them gain academic achivements, which provides them with more job oppoturnities.
The expenses of living are increasing but with above-mentioned measures, the governments can urgently take action against this negative development.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 154, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ct is that it creates financial burden. The example can be seen in single household...
^^^
Line 3, column 56, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ere are diversified remedies to resolve this problems. One of the most recommended s...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, may, so, well, as to, for instance, no doubt, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1366.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17424242424 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05289871135 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.621212121212 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2665866346 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5714285714 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8571428571 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92857142857 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160938859141 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0527737280089 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531904403919 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0891770764553 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0202391984889 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.