the table shows how many people used different form public transport in million between 2010 and 2014.
The given table depict the ratio of people who used distinct public transport from 2010 to 2014. The data is calibrated in million.
The most striking feature to be observed is that matro was the most prevalent transport among people.
It can be vividly seen that in,In 2010 the total number of passengers were 7.3 million who used all types of transport system whereas the ratio was doubled in 2014 with 14 million people. The proportion of people were equally reported for trains and buses with 1.8 million people in 2012.
Turning to the rest of description, the figure of metro and trains rising slightly from 3 million to 5 million and 1.4 million to 3.6 million. As far as comparison is concerned the cabs stood at lowest position for transportation by masses compare to other public transport. Further, in case of trams, the number of rise slowly for the next three years than other public transport vehicle.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...2010 to 2014. The data is calibrated in million. The most striking feature to be ob...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... The data is calibrated in million. The most striking feature to be observed is...
^^^
Line 5, column 31, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , In
...eople. It can be vividly seen that in,In 2010 the total number of passengers wer...
^^^
Line 7, column 302, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ic transport. Further, in case of trams, the number of rise slowly for the next ...
^^
Line 7, column 329, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ase of trams, the number of rise slowly for the next three years than other publ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 767.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85443037975 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44851651735 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607594936709 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 215.1 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.0668281585 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.875 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.375 5.23603664747 26% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318448443841 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136550379349 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0902296545789 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196246494798 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117563393212 0.0819641961636 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.