The table shows information and predictions regarding the change in the percentage of the population aged 65 and above in three countries.
The provided table compares the proportional change in relation to the population of the aged people in the three countries(Canada, the UK, and Germany) in two different years 1988, and 2000. Also, the table details the predictional analysis for the same over a period of the next 30 years.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the UK had the least percentage of the old people, while Germany topped the list in this context. However, a significant rise in the aged population is envisaged in all three countries by the end of the period.
According to the given illustration, Canada, and Germany witnessed a marginal uptick in the percentage of the senior population in the early years. Whilst the former followed an upward trend with a 4.35% change to 20.67 in 2000, a nearly 5% spike uplifted the proportional rate to 25.32% in the latter country. However, the UK observed a slight push of just 0.66% as against 14.23% in the starting year.
As per the predictions, Canada is expected to have 5.68% more aged people as they were in 2000. Also, the UK will climb to 20.35% of the senior population, compared to Germany who is targeted to be at the highest position of 30.42% by the period end.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1028.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82629107981 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77120207377 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577464788732 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7967782817 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.222222222 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189808641155 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756964936704 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0727384618583 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114269255975 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0728891521165 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.