The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types between 2000 and 2009

The given table illustrates the Middle School Attendance in terms of the percentage of junior students in 4 different kinds of Schools in a period of 9 years. Overall, it was clear that only the figure for Community Schools obtained an upward trend while other Schools experienced a downward trend.
In the year 2000, the percentage of student attendance in Voluntary-controlled Schools is the highest, at 52%. It gradually went down to 38% and 20% in 2005 and 2009, respectively. There was a dramatic drop in haft in Grammar Schools, whereas the number of that in Specialist Schools showed a very marginal decline of 2% during the 9-year timescale.
Looking at the figure for Community Schools, it accounted for far less of that in Voluntary-controlled Schools at only 12% in 2000. There was a sudden rise in the proportion of student attention in Community Schools, which increased nearly five times as much as the number in 2000, at 58%. This number was far more than those in other schools, about triple in Voluntary-controlled Schools and six times in the rest of 2 schools.

Votes
Average: 7.2 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 79, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...udent attendance in Voluntary-controlled Schools is the highest, at 52%. It gradu...
^^
Line 3, column 103, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...far less of that in Voluntary-controlled Schools at only 12% in 2000. There was a...
^^
Line 3, column 381, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ls, about triple in Voluntary-controlled Schools and six times in the rest of 2 s...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 901.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92349726776 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2355726072 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55737704918 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.7255676985 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.625 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189266058838 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.086476184746 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439849408839 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133151991595 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351869904648 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.