The table shows the worldwide market share of the mobile phone market for manufactures in the years 2005 and 2006.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
mobile phone market
The table describes the percentagewise share of several mobile phone companies in the global market in the year 2005 and 2006.
Overall, in the both years, Nokia contributed to maximum share in worldwide mobile phone sales, while Benq mobile made the lowest contribution.
In the year 2005, nokia accounted for 32.5% share and it rose to 35% in 2006, being the largest share in global market. Similarly, Motorola’s sale was 17.7% in 2005 and after one year it increased to 21.1 %. The sale of Sony Ericsson was 6.3% in the beggining and had a1 % growth in the end.
However, sale of Samsung company declined to approximately 1% inthe successive years whereas sale of Benq mobile reduced to its half of its share. In the meantime, there was no major difference in LG mobile sales,it was almost same. Despites this, the other mobile phones company made up 19.2% share in 2005 and in 2006 their sale dropped to 16.2% eventhough, made a second major contribution in the share market.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-03 | pris | 78 | view |
| 2020-08-06 | Nancysachdeva | 73 | view |
| 2020-08-06 | Nancysachdeva | 11 | view |
- The chart below gives information about global population percentages and distribution of wealth by region Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 61
- Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of the following topic The idea of having a single career is becoming an old fashioned one The new fashion will be to have several careers or ways of earning money and f 89
- Some people believe it is important to give gifts and presents to friends and family to show that we care for them Others think that there are better ways to show affection to them Discuss both the views and give your own opinion 73
- Nowadays people change their appearance by dying hair buying fashionable clothes wearing make ups and even undergoing plastic surgery What are the reasons Do you think it is a positive or negative development 76
- Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works of art by using a computer Do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ket in the year 2005 and 2006. Overall, in the both years, Nokia contributed to ...
^^
Line 3, column 50, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ar 2005, nokia accounted for 32.5% share and it rose to 35% in 2006, being the la...
^^
Line 4, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... meantime, there was no major difference in LG mobile sales,it was almost same. D...
^^
Line 4, column 213, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
... no major difference in LG mobile sales,it was almost same. Despites this, the oth...
^^^
Line 4, column 312, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... company made up 19.2% share in 2005 and in 2006 their sale dropped to 16.2% ev...
^^
Line 4, column 332, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...2% share in 2005 and in 2006 their sale dropped to 16.2% eventhough, made a sec...
^^
Line 4, column 350, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd in 2006 their sale dropped to 16.2% eventhough, made a second major contribu...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, similarly, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 817.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8630952381 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5999001844 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9902921327 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.125 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279694144728 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132734175101 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0993338365111 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201583927355 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0705453782791 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.