The table shows the worldwide market share of the mobile phone market for manufactures in the years 2005 and 2006.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given table illustrates the sales data (in percentage) for different mobile companies in the context of global market contribution for the years 2005 and 2006.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that over the period as a whole, with a noticeable surge, Nokia continued to dominate the worldwide market, followed next by Motorola, Samsung, and others. Also, over time, sales of all but three brands plummeted significantly.
To begin with, the highest proportion of 32.5% was witnessed in Nokia sales, compared to Motorola, and Samsung, with 17.7%, and 12.7% respectively. Furthermore, whilst Sony Ericsson, L.G, and Benq mobile observed only 6.3%, 6.7%, and 4.9% of the total sales, more than three-times of those were reported from the other brand's sales.
Turning to 2006, the sales proportion of Nokia, Motorola, and Sony Ericsson experienced an upward trend, reaching 35%, 21.1%, and 7.4% respectively. However, by contrast, a marginal dip plunged the sales share of Samsung, L.G, BenQ mobile, and others down to only 11.8%, 6.3%, 2.4%, and 16.2% by the period end.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 186, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: G
...y. Furthermore, whilst Sony Ericsson, L.G, and Benq mobile observed only 6.3%, 6....
^
Line 7, column 225, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: G
...p plunged the sales share of Samsung, L.G, BenQ mobile, and others down to only 1...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, look, so, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 941.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37714285714 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71914752548 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657142857143 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 9.0 0.482926829268 1864% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0813031608 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.428571429 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 5.23603664747 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138475306144 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0610108755934 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0851537634072 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0963050244382 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0962022215668 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.