THe tables and pie chart show in percentage terms the results of a survey of a new shopping complex in Aukland, NEw Zealand.
The tables and pie chart provide an overview of people's opinion in Auckland, New Zealand about the new shopping complex.
The tables depict the review of the customers regarding the shops and restaurants in a new shopping store in Auckland, new Zealand. And the pie diagram illustrates the reactions of the shoppers towards the design of the store. The data is interpreted in terms of percentage.
In the case of shops, 45% of men and 37% of women was satisfied, while both the genders were dissatisfied in equal proportion ( 20%). About 34% females were highly in favour of shops, however, the proportion of males were just half of their female counterparts. Similarly, the same trend can be observed for the category 'no comment', in which men( 18%) was double in number than women(9%).
According to the second table, a significant difference in the percentage of both the genders being satisfied can be noted, 55% men and 32% women. As a high proportion of females were dissatisfied, only a small part of men agreed to dissatisfy. Even though, a remarkable 5% difference existed between the genders who had no feedback, males differed from females being very satisfied on a mere 2%. From the pie chart it can be understood, 62% and 11% of the both genders together was satisfied and dissatisfied respectively.
In overall, it can be inferred that most of the men were satisfied in concern with restaurants and women preferred shops.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 126, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rs were dissatisfied in equal proportion 20%. About 34% females were highly in fa...
^^
Line 3, column 353, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: double
...tegory no comment, in which men 18% was double in number than women9%. According to the sec...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 384, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 18% was double in number than women9%. According to the second table, a signifi...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 525, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...atisfied and dissatisfied respectively. In overall, it can be inferred that most...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, second, similarly, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1091.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91441441441 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89704082613 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563063063063 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.694317226 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1818181818 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1818181818 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124788285406 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0537504492872 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11108587005 0.0843802449381 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0935848168648 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137329519234 0.0819641961636 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.