The tables below give information abou sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The following tables show how many millions of euros of coffee and bananas which were labelled Fairtrade sold in five European nations in two different years of 1999 and 2004.
As can be clearly observed from the first table, there were a dramatic increase in sales of coffee in UK and Switzerland, from 1.5 to 20 and from 3 to 6, respectively during 1999 to 2004. By contrast, other three countries witnessed a slight climb in sales of coffee. Coffee sales in Denmark was 1.8 in 1999 and reached 2 million Euros, while coffee sales in Belgium went up a bit more from 1 to 1.7 at the same course. Likewise, the same sales pattern could be seen in Sweden.
With regard to the second table, unlike the fact that Switzerland, UK, and Belgium experienced a remarkable rise in bananas sales during 1999 to 2004, there were a sharp decline in sales of bananas in Sweden and Denmark. Bananas sales in Switzerland become more than triple, from 15 in 1999 touched 47 in 2004. Similarly, UK and Belgium bananas sales rocketed wildly from 1 to 5.5 and from 0.6 to 4 within 1999 to 2004. On the other hand, sales of bananas were virtually halved from 1.8 to 1 and from 2 to 0.9 during 1999 to 2000.
It is clear from the tables that despite other nations, UK and Switzerland observed far more considerable rise in sales of both coffee and bananas during 1999 to 2004.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, likewise, second, similarly, so, while, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 33.7804878049 172% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1112.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 247.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5020242915 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43592173475 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497975708502 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4916824834 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.2 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 5.23603664747 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227389502297 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112935001018 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496935212934 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169219264298 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358218569159 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.12 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.