Do you think English will remain to be a global language despite globalization?
Recently, the phenomenon of "English will remain to be a global language despite globalization" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that globalization might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that a global language can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the literature standpoint, English as a global language can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that learning English and the ability of making communications are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the effects of English in the developing countries. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both writing books in other languages and publication companies distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of language science, without the slightest doubt, the role of English as a global language might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of the death of other languages. Moreover, fundamental aspects of globalization can relate to the reality that the demerits of being a monolingual can pertain to in danger languages. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of the predominating language were correlated positively with minor languages, the local authorities would ultimately address globalization issues. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of a proper balance between English and other languages.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that the merits of English as a global language far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-16 | Rafia Jawad | 72 | view |
| 2024-09-04 | Rafia Jawad | 77 | view |
| 2024-06-11 | Sridarani | 79 | view |
| 2024-05-14 | y.yousefi90@gmail.com | 77 | view |
| 2024-05-14 | y.yousefi90@gmail.com | 77 | view |
- Wealthy nations are required to share their wealth with poorer countries What is your opinion 77
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops What is your opinion on this Do you think this is a good or bad change 89
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters such as food clothes and entertainment is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes Other people believe that it is important 89
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both thes 89
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 148, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1643.0 1207.87684729 136% => OK
No of words: 285.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7649122807 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41159105465 2.71678728327 126% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.8320367849 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.363636364 104.977214359 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9090909091 20.9669160288 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.413694736148 0.242375264174 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153482323887 0.0925447433944 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104869260806 0.071462118173 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247643633598 0.151781067708 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0969767178221 0.0609392437508 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 12.6369458128 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 53.1260098522 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.53 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.