Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life. Discuss.
Recently, the phenomenon of "people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that working too much time might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that having time for the personal life can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the economics standpoint, spending too much time at work can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that earning more income and working extra hours are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the salary of 44 hours work per week. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both improving life quality and obtaining more money distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of psychology, without the slightest doubt, working too many hours might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of workaholic people. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the work time can relate to the reality that the demerits of less attention to the personal life can pertain to the mental tiredness. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downside of work hours were correlated positively with family hours, the local authorities would ultimately address the job satisfaction. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of job opportunities.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt vigorously to support the idea that the merits of spending enough time for personal life far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-24 | Sridarani | 77 | view |
| 2022-05-27 | sandeep.daksha@gmail.com | 85 | view |
| 2020-12-02 | Basil3241 | 77 | view |
| 2020-06-08 | sattar_iust | 88 | view |
| 2020-05-20 | mndpsngh21 | 75 | view |
- Television serves many functions Watching TV makes us relax We can learn knowledge and information from TV programs Besides TV can also be seen as a companion To what extent do you agree with this 77
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 78
- If Voting is compulsory in democratic society what conclusions can we draw about Nature of democracy 88
- The diagram below shows how the Australian Bureau of Meteorology collects up to the minute information on the weather in order to produce reliable forecasts Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 291.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48109965636 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0672292894 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 139.433497537 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618556701031 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.8297600915 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.0 104.977214359 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4545454545 20.9669160288 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.443066108254 0.242375264174 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147937837105 0.0925447433944 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.15432991242 0.071462118173 216% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24901788995 0.151781067708 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.164799308436 0.0609392437508 270% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 12.6369458128 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 53.1260098522 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 11.5310837438 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.24 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.