The charts below show the levels of participations in education and science in developing and industrialized countries in 1980 to 1990 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The charts below show the levels of participations in education and science in developing and industrialized countries in 1980 to 1990.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The following charts illustrate to what extent developing and industrialized countries participated in education and science in a decade of 1980 to 1990.
As can be clearly observed from the charts, three measure of average years of schooling, number of scientists and technicians per 1000 people, and money spending on research and development were surveyed. The first chart provides information about the average years people spent on schools. It experienced in both developing and modern countries a significant rise. The increase in former countries was from a bit more than 2 years to around 3 years, while it increased from 8 years in 1980 to nearly 10 years of 1990 in latter countries.
Turning to the second chart, unlike developing countries which witnessed a slight climb from about 10 to approximately 18 during 1980 to 1990, the number of scientists and technicians per 1000 went up dramatically in industrialized regions from 40 to virtually 70 at the same course. Regarding the third chart, whereas money which was spent in R&D section became double in modern countries, it declined significantly from $50 million to about $10 million in developing countries in 1990.
Overall, it is clear from the charts that industrialized countries experienced far more remarkable rise in all three sections. On the other hand, the rise of developing countries was not as considerable as modern counterparts, albeit one measure went down during 1980 to 1990.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, second, third, whereas, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1227.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22127659574 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09409987745 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544680851064 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 345.6 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.6210654826 43.030603864 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.333333333 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1111111111 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.77777777778 5.23603664747 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22564501138 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114040198316 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0885509923924 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184268329744 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.098529221127 0.0819641961636 120% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.