The tables below give information about sales of Fair-trade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.

Essay topics:

The tables below give information about sales of Fair-trade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.

The tables illustrate how fairtrade coffee and bananas were sold in five European countries in 1999 and 2004. Overall, it is clear that sales of coffee in all the sampled places experienced an increase during the five years; also a rise could be seen in those of bananas in the majority of countries except Sweden and Denmark.
Starting with the coffee sales, there was an obvious growth in the UK, from 1.5 million euros in 1999 to 20 million euros in 2004. Meanwhile, the data in Switzerland was doubled from 3 million euros to 6 million euros, and the figures for both Denmark and Sweden increased by the same million euros(0.2), from 1.8 to 2 and from 0.8 to 1 respectively. Even if the coffee sales in the five countries ranged from 0.8 to 3 million euros in 1999, the UK had far larger amount of coffee sold than any other state in 2004.
Turning now to banana sales, Switzerland, at 15 million euros, sold the largest number among the five in 1999 and then its figure rose to 47 million euros in 2004, which still remain the biggest number. The five years also witnessed a moderate rise in the UK (from 1 to 5.5 million euros) and Belgium (from 0.6 to 4 million euros). However, the sales of bananas experienced a decrease in Sweden (1.8—1 million euros) and Denmark (2—0.9 million euros.)

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, still, then, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1062.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55793991416 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36933972774 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519313304721 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.7826994824 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.75 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.125 22.9334400587 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183955437028 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114499667034 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0943589031126 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156255564833 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0746506361477 0.0819641961636 91% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.42 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.76 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.