The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries

Essay topics:

The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.

The two tables demonstrates data about the amount of gaining euros in scale of million for several countries in Europe by selling coffee and bananas in two various years of 1999 and 2004.
Overall, it is clear while selling coffee was extremely successful in the UK, the greatest numbers of bananas have been sold in Switzerland. Also, the amount of money which obtained of selling coffee rose sharply in UK in 2004 as like the bananas which was over triplicate in the same year.

In the first chart, the highest amount of selling coffee was allocated to UK with 1.5 million euros in 1999 and then increased dramatically to 20. Second biggest sales was for Switzerland which gained 3 and then doubled to 6 million in 1999 and 2004 respectively. The growth for Denmark was absolutely low, with only 0.2 million from 1.8 to 2 in 2004. Meanwhile, in 1999, 1 million was devoted to Belgium which enlarged to 1.7 in the other year. Finally, Sweden rose slightly from 0.8 to 1 million in 2004.

In the second table, selling bananas was a really huge achievement which devoted 15 million in 1999 and then increased to 47 in 2004. Simultaneously, both UK and Belgium grew from 1 and 0.6 to 5.5 and 4 million respectively. Opposite of the mentioned countries, Sweden and Denmark pursued the declining way where both of them reduced to near 1 in 2004 from near 2 million.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, really, second, so, then, while, as for

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1130.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6887966805 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63679152526 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497925311203 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1189242856 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.727272727 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9090909091 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54545454545 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17799011834 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772484714454 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582544240051 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130443788434 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059071689648 0.0819641961636 72% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.