More and more companies are allowing employees to work at home. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
Since technology was improved, more and more people have been asked to work from their homes. Although this change has been thought as a positive development, I myself believe it is not. Despite all the possible good effects, it has more adverse points which has made it to be a negative improvement based on some reasons which will be mentioned in this essay.
First of all, I believe the main principle concept of working is when people have left their houses to go to their workplaces. Indeed, dwellings have been made for human’s relaxing time which they could lessen their stress nonetheless their work could not been done while they are not at home such as home’s servants. But nowadays because of improving technology systems, other jobs which in the past had needed the presence of their employees, could be done at homes, too. Moreover, this alternative not only has changed the meaning of working, but also has made people lazier than before. Consequently, lot of horrible effects has occurred to people just because of their laziness including health problems such as overweight and etc.
Additionally, following the negative changes which have happened to individuals who has been working inside their house, it has also altered their behavior and qualities. The essential base of human-being’s life has been their connections with others. In other words, not only working outside has been a way for earning money to meet their needs, but also they have had many relationships with others which have made their life meaningful. As a result, working the whole day inside of their house, has led people to be isolated and solitary which have affected on their mind and emotions.
In conclusion, even though not having to be present in workplaces and have the opportunity to work at homes has had many good effects especially on environment, it has had diverse negative points on people’s life. To addict, based on writer’s opinion this horrible aspects are range from health problem, laziness and the more significant one which is changing the concept of their life which is having connection with others.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-16 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-11 | vuhongminh | 61 | view |
| 2024-11-11 | nguyennhathuy | 56 | view |
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same periods 73
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extend do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 89
- The graphs below show the numbers of male and female worker in 1975 and 1995 in several employment sectors of the republic of Fredonia 73
- The graphs below show the numbers of male and female worker in 1975 and 1995 in several employment sectors of the republic of Fredonia 73
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 729, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...ding health problems such as overweight and etc. Additionally, following the negative...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1785.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07102272727 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6375006732 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511363636364 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 541.8 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.6323270081 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.5 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1428571429 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0714285714 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140888472553 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0600832296571 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482477659973 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114994403948 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0654781996055 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.