The tables show the amount of money spent on Fairtrade coffee and
bananas in two separate years in the UK, Switzerland, Denmark, Belgium
and Sweden.
It is clear that sales of Fairtrade coffee rose in all five European countries
from 1999 to 2004, but sales of Fairtrade bananas only went up in three
out of the five countries. Overall, the UK saw by far the highest levels of
spending on the two products.
In 1999, Switzerland had the highest sales of Fairtrade coffee, at €3
million, while revenue from Fairtrade bananas was highest in the UK, at
€15 million. By 2004, however, sales of Fairtrade coffee in the UK had
risen to €20 million, and this was over three times higher than
Switzerland’s sales figure for Fairtrade coffee in that year. The year 2004
also saw dramatic increases in the money spent on Fairtrade bananas in
the UK and Switzerland, with revenues rising by €32 million and €4.5
million respectively.
Sales of the two Fairtrade products were far lower in Denmark, Belgium, and Sweden. Small increases in sales of Fairtrade coffee can be seen,
but revenue remained at €2 million or below in all three countries in both
years. Finally, it is noticeable that the money spent on Fairtrade bananas
actually fell in Belgium and Sweden.
- Some People think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society Others however believe tat school is the place to learn this Discuss both these views and give your opinion 84
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured 78
- The diagram below shows a possible future means of home energy production 84
- Some people believe that it is essential to include physical education classes in the curriculum for all school aged children Others think that children s time is better spent on more academic subjects 78
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, however, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1084.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01851851852 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58848881559 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486111111111 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.970668258 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.444444444 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 18.0 3.83414634146 469% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340543588113 0.215688989381 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152934947798 0.103423049105 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112392591321 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111634638849 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0996047967983 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.