The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The tables below show the amount of money spent on Fairtrade coffee and bananas in two separate years in five different nations in Europe.
Overall, sales of coffee rose in all five countries from 1999 to 2004. However, that of bananas only saw an increase in three out of five. Switzerland was the country with the most expenditure on bananas, and for coffee, it was the UK.
In 1999, Switzerland had the highest sales of coffee, at 3 million euros, and the figure for bananas was also far more than that of other countries, at 15 million euros. Britain only made 1.5 million euros from Fairtrade coffee in the first year, but the year 2004 saw a significant rise in coffee sales, peaking at 20 million euros. In terms of bananas, the UK's revenue increased by 4.5 million euros, making it the country with the second-most money spent on these Fairtrade products.
If we look at the other countries, sales in Denmark, Belgium and Sweden were quite inferior to that of the two aforementioned nations. There were some marginal increases in the sales of Fairtrade coffee, but all figures were not any greater than 2 million euros. A similar trend was true in bananas' sales too, but in fact revenue in Denmark even underwent a significant reduction and decreased by over 50 percent.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, second, so, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1065.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77578475336 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51521141926 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556053811659 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 324.0 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9176173299 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.5 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184066783476 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840353763558 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632641483974 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129194514086 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451148665698 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.